[SPG_Active_Members] Swiss format archive
Olin Sibert
osibert at siliconkeep.com
Thu May 20 05:19:02 PDT 2010
I think calling this a "publicity stunt" is being too kind.
They seem to be claiming that they have created some unique physical
artifact, which must be kept secret and stored safely away untouched
by human hands, as if it's some kind of digital Rosetta Stone
awaiting a future Champollion to discover it and magically bring enlightenment.
What bosh. If they really wanted to help "future generations to read
data stored using defunct technology", they'd collect the information
publicly, and store replicas of it all over the world (e.g., the
Internet). I mean, even granting that they might be smart people,
what if they forgot something? Surely would be better to find that
out sooner, rather than when the "time capsule" gets opened decades hence.
One of the great things about digital data, and about paper, too, is
the ease with which it can be replicated. We've learned a bit in the
last few thousand years, and one of those things is that carving
marks in stone tablets--while certainly durable--had some
disadvantages. Another is that open, collective models tend to
preserve and maintain information better than secret ones.
I'd be sore disappointed if it had been my 15 million Euros spent on this.
And does anyone really believe that formats like the CD won't be
readily readable 25 years hence? The Yellow Book CD-ROM standard is
already 25 years old, and billions of data CDs are sold every year,
all of which are instantly readable by billions of devices across the
globe. It may lose popularity, but it's not going away. The media may
deteriorate, sure, and that's a serious issue, but if the media is
gone, some magic box of instructions for reading the format won't help.
Furthermore, is the guy who's complaining about not being able to
read his thesis actually serious? He seems to have received his Ph.D.
in 1993, so it's not likely his data is stored on 7-track magtape or
something actually difficult like that. If he used a PC (or a Mac),
I'll bet that if he could FIND the diskettes or CDs on which he
stored it, he wouldn't have much trouble reading them with any modern
version of Word or WordPerfect, because they have converters for old
formats built in. And if he used LaTeX on some Unix system, well,
that hasn't exactly disappeared, either. His case might be bad
luck--perhaps all his backups are on some wacky QIC tape cartridge
format--but even there, it's not hard to find specialists to read
that media today. And if there aren't any backups? Well, that's
always a sad story, but knowing how to interpret the format the
backups should have been in is cold comfort indeed.
Stunts like this distract from the very real problems of organizing
and cataloging valuable information, of devising tools for
maintaining format compatibility, of developing truly durable and
inexpensive storage media, and of ensuring reliable, survivable,
accessible storage.
-- Olin Sibert
At 03:08 AM 5/20/2010, Peter Capek wrote:
>There seems not to be anything very serious or very detailed. There
>is a web site which took some effort to find with a bit more
>information: <http://www.planets-project.eu/>http://www.planets-project.eu/
>
>The effort seems to be a part of the PLANETS project, a cooperative
>effort among 16 organizations, of which 2 got the credit for putting
>the box in the mountain.
>
>It seems to me as much as anything to have been a publicity stunt.
>
>Peter Capek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: ../attachments/20100520/5e9f31ef/attachment.html
More information about the SCC_active
mailing list